Imagine walking into a new Honda showroom and telling the salesman that you won’t be buying that new model this year, as you often do.

And by the way, before you kick the tires one last time and stroll out the door, you ask if the dealer would be so kind as to write you a check for the full sticker price of a brand-new Accord, fully loaded, since, by resisting the urge to buy, and making do with your tired old vehicle for one more year, you have made sure that the dealership now will have one more car in its inventory than it otherwise would — a benefit for the dealer every bit as tangible as if the factory had shipped one extra car for free to the showroom floor.

Sound nutty? Well, on Monday, September 13, the FERC Staff will hold a conference to debate this very idea – applied not to new model cars, but to wholesale electricity. (Notice of Technical Conference, FERC Docket RM10-17.)

Read more »

Posted: September 10th, 2010 under Conservation, Demand Response, Electric Utility Regulation, Energy Efficiency, Energy Markets, FERC, ISOs, LMPs, Locational Marginal Prices, RTOs, Ratepayer Benefits, Smart Grid.
Comments: 2

Once every decade or so, the feds launch a new crusade to convert Americans to the metric system, only to give way to indifference or outright ridicule.

Contracts for federally funded highway projects were to conform to metric measurement by Sept. 30, 2000 — until Congress revoked the deadline. Yet federal agencies already had been required to go metric — both by the Omnibus Trade and Competiveness Act of 1988, which had imposed a 1992 deadline, and before that by Executive Order 12770, signed by President Bush the Elder in 1991. And of course, that was after President Reagan in 1982 had disbanded and cancelled funding for the U.S. Metric Board, which had been created seven years earlier through Public Law 94-168, the Metric Conversion Act of 1975, to coordinate the country’s voluntary conversion centimeters, kilograms, and degrees Celsius.

Now, however, comes a metric crusade of a different sort — a request from the staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, filed Feb. 3, 1010, asking for written comments from the U.S. electric utility industry on a set of performance metrics that the staff has proposed to track and evaluate the performance of ISO/RTO operations and their regional wholesale power markets. And like the metric initiatives that have marked the past forty years, this one appears mired in politics of the most divisive sort. Read more »

Posted: April 6th, 2010 under Benchmarking, California, California Public Utilities Commission, Electric Utility Regulation, Energy Price, FERC, ISOs, LMPs, Locational Marginal Prices, RTOs, Ratepayer Benefits.
Comments: 1